Page 70 - Micro5 Brochure 2017
P. 70

516 J. Phys. Ther. Sci. Vol. 23, No. 3, 2011

advantages such as increased sensory comfort and excellent        Table 1. General characteristics of the subjects
stability, with no muscular contraction, electrical
discomfort, or significant side effects8).                                               Experimental     Control Group
                                                                                             Group
   Low electric stimulation is a promising approach for
angiogenic therapy9,10). Electric field stimulation is known      Gender(M/F)                      4/12             7/6
to enhance the secretion of growth factors11). A distinct
therapeutic effect of ultra-low microcurrent has also been            Age(yr)            67.88±7.99       70.38±4.35
reported for diabetes, high blood pressure, and wound
healing in recent reports12).                                         Height(cm)         159.56±7.16      162.15±5.51

   In Korea, microcurrent has been shown to delay the                 Weight(kg)         59.13±8.52       63.77±9.17
onset of myalgia13), improve sympathetic nerve tone14),
promote wound healing15), increase β-endorphin and pain           Values are M±SD
threshold levels16), repress bacterial growth17), reduce foot
muscular fatigue and pain18), and increase the blood flow         Table 2. The change of blood flow in the experimental and
rate19,20). Pain alleviation and tissue changes induced by                     control groups
microcurrent therapy have been observed during treatment
of myofascial pain syndrome patients with chronic back            group            Pre-            Post-  Mean
pain21). Based on these reports, microcurrent is clearly
effective in pain alleviation, tissue regeneration, facilitating                   intervention intervention difference
wound and fracture healing, repressing bacterial growth,
and improving the blood flow rate by relieving tension in         EG 2.21±1.50 3.40±2.31 1.19±2.11*
the sympathetic nervous system.
                                                                  CG               3.51±2.98 4.03±2.13              .52±2.32
   In the present study, our aim was to search for methods
that would promote the health of diabetes patients. Our           Values are M±SE
approach was to investigate the effect of microcurrent            EG : experimental group
electrical stimulation, provided through a shoe, on blood         CG : control group
circulation and pain in the feet of diabetes patients.            *p<0.05 compared to the control

                 SUBJECTS AND METHODS                             group with a control group, data were entered into a
                                                                  computer and the measured values before and after the
   The subjects of this study were selected from among            stimulation were normalized, using the stable values as the
diabetes patients over the age of 60 living in P city. The        reference values.
study included 32 subjects who were without complications
of the heart, kidneys, nerves, and retinas, whose fasting            After measuring the stable blood flow rate, the subjects
blood glucose was over 120 mg/l, who complained of pain           were randomly arranged into a control group and the
or tingling of the feet that was diagnosed as neuropathy and      experimental group. The experimental group was given
were being treated with medicines, and who did not ingest         shoes (G-man, Korea) through which the microcurrent was
any food that could affect blood circulation during the           delivered, while the control group was given the same
experiment. Having understood the purpose of the study            shape of shoes but without microcurrent. After one hour of
and voluntarily agreeing to participate, the subjects were        walking exercise, the blood flow rate was again measured.
randomly arranged into an experimental and control group          The microcurrent delivered by the shoes was a pulsed
to perform a double blind study. The general characteristics      microcurrent of less than 300 μA.
of the 29 subjects who completed the exercise program (3
subjects who failed to continue the exercise program during          The degree of foot pain after the microcurrent
the experiment were excluded) are given in Table 1.               application to the diabetic subjects was assessed by a Visual
                                                                  Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire. The degree of pain was
   The measurement of the blood flow rate in the feet of the      measured twice once before beginning the exercise and 4
diabetes patients was performed at a laboratory temperature       weeks after performing a walking exercise for one hour per
maintained at 24 ± 1 and a humidity of 50 ± 10%. The              day for 4 weeks.
subjects were allowed to take a rest for one hour before the
laboratory test. Blood flow rate in the feet was then                The data were processed statistically using SPSS ver.
measured using the Biopac System MP150 pulse                      12.0. The independent t-test was performed to verify the
plethysmogram (Biopac System, Inc., USA). The subjects            significance of the differences in the mean values between
assumed a supine position before the measurement and the          the groups and the measurement items within each group.
stable blood flow rate was measured for 30 seconds in that        The significance level (α) was chosen as 0.05 for the
position and again after one hour of walking exercise.            statistical analysis.

   A simple sensor was attached to the tip of the subject’s                                    RESULTS
toe and the stable real-time flow rate variation was
monitored in the supine position. To eliminate individual            The change in the blood flow rate of the subjects before
differences and to allow comparison of the experimental           and after the intervention was as follows. The blood flow
                                                                  rate of the experimental group increased from 2.21 ± 1.50
                                                                  mv/V before the intervention to 3.40 ± 2.31 mv/V after the
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75